Filipino SA Humanidades, Agham Panlipunan. 
Actividades sobre el libro El Mago de Oz, comentario. Temas 1-15 Teoría del Presupuesto y del Gasto Público. Apuntes capitulo1-9 Psicología del Aprendizaje. Resumen de libro de la asignatura de Trabajo Social con Comunidades. Apuntes Completos Hematología, Temas 1-14.pdf. Apuntes, tema 4-14 - Apuntes completos de Psicofarmacología con imágenes. Introducción a la Sociología (resumen libro). Apuntes, lecciones 1-10 - introduccion a la economía para turismo. Introducción al Derecho Financiero y Tributario. Operaciones y Procesos de Producción (169023104). Delincuencia Juvenil y Derecho Penal de Menores (26612145). Big data y business intelligence (Big data). Aprendizaje y desarrollo de la personalidad. Estrategia y Organización de Empresas Internacionales (50850004). Jurisdicción Contencioso-Administrativa (66013079). Lengua Española: Expresión Oral y Escrita. Introducción a la Macroeconomía (65901027). Mundos Anglófonos en Perspectiva Histórica y Cultural (64021040). Introducción a la Sociología I (69021010). Introducción a la Contabilidad (410008). Kaplan didn't need to weigh in on the literary point, but his doing so doesn't create a mistrial. Indeed, Carroll's 2019 book is titled "What Do We Need Men For? A Modest Proposal." The Swift reference is clear, and lawyers need to remember that the judge is always the smartest person in the room. Of course, Tacopina ran the risk of Kaplan's interjecting when he touched on such an obvious point. The point, Tacopina wrote, is that it was inappropriate for the judge to get involved because it showed favoritism. 
Tacopina's letter went further by actually going through the trouble of distinguishing between Carroll's and Swift's satires, observing that Carroll referred to men while Swift referred to children. In his failed mistrial letter, Trump's lawyer argued that it was inappropriate for the judge to chime in and provide this context. Then Kaplan interjected to note that Carroll's satire comes from Jonathan Swift's " A Modest Proposal," a satirical essay from the 18th century that "proposed" poor Irish parents sell their children as food. When he pressed her, Carroll pointed out that it was satire, suggesting that Tacopina was an idiot if he didn't understand that.
Tacopina pointed to an exchange with Carroll on cross-examination about a reference in her book to sending all men to Montana for retraining.
0 kommentar(er)
